Template reuse
Reusable templates let teams standardize documents yet lack large public libraries or deep merge/document generation capabilities.
Teams seek alternatives when they need deeper automation, richer mobile apps, broader integrations, or clearer pricing that scales with high-volume signing and vendor negotiation workflows.
SignNow is positioned as a secure, compliant, and cost-effective eSignature solution used across industries in the United States.
Assently produces court-admissible audit trails and supports eIDAS to meet legal signature requirements within jurisdictions that recognize electronic signatures.
Simple, account-free signing for recipients with clear steps for in-person and remote signing, but lacks the advanced guided signing options found in some competitors.
Allows adding basic fillable fields and multiple signers with support for signing order; it does not provide advanced auto-detection or calculated fields for complex documents.
Includes kiosk-mode for on-site signing, useful for front-desk or event check-ins where device-controlled signing is required.
Supports reusable templates for repeatable contracts, but template libraries and automation are more limited than enterprise-focused alternatives.
Reusable templates let teams standardize documents yet lack large public libraries or deep merge/document generation capabilities.
Documents can be exported to cloud storages, but prebuilt connectors to many mainstream cloud apps are limited.
Full-text search for stored documents helps discovery for executed contracts.
Document groups are not a core feature, reducing folder-level collaboration flexibility.
Supports basic fillable fields but not calculated or conditional advanced fields needed for complex forms.
Supports signing order but lacks advanced conditional routing for multi-step approvals.
| Setting Name | Configuration |
|---|---|
| Signing order | Sequential |
| Two-factor auth | Enabled |
| Kiosk mode | Enabled |
| Export destination | Cloud storage |
| Criteria | signNow | Assently E-Sign | SIGNiX | SignRequest | Notarize | Signority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eSign a document | ||||||
| Add multiple signers | ||||||
| Add fillable fields | ||||||
| Set signing order | ||||||
| API/Integrations | integration api | api integration | integrations available | integration api | api integration | api integration |
| signNow | Assently E-Sign | SIGNiX | SignRequest | Notarize | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry-level offering | Business plan 15 | Contact sales | Contact sales | Free/paid tiers | Contact sales |
| Enterprise option | Enterprise available | Enterprise available | Enterprise available | Enterprise quotes | Enterprise available |
| Per-envelope pricing | Available on request | Not specified | Contact sales | Not specified | Contact sales |
| Notes for negotiators | Ask about bulk send limits | Validate API rates | Ask about SLAs | Confirm integration caps | Verify notarization fees |
Procurement teams negotiating vendor agreements benefit from solutions with bulk send, robust APIs, and clear enterprise pricing. signNow and Signority offer strong bulk and API support, while Assently is useful where eIDAS-level signatures are required for cross-border procurement.
Legal teams needing court-admissible trails and specific compliance options should prioritize vendors with explicit HIPAA, SOC2, or notarization capabilities. Notarize and signNow target these needs, whereas Assently emphasizes eIDAS for European legal workflows.
Assently supports signed agreements and audit trails
Leading to reliable legal evidence when eIDAS signatures are required
For mass vendor negotiations, reusable templates speed processing
Resulting in higher integration effort compared with signNow or SignRequest