• Electronic Signature
• Resources
• Alternatives
• Best contract management and GateKeeper alternatives for life sciences

Best contract management and GateKeeper alternatives for life sciences

Start free trial

No credit card required

signNow regularly wins awards for ease of use and setup

Introduction to GateKeeper

GateKeeper is an electronic signature and contract-handling tool used by organizations requiring regulated signing workflows; it provides basic field placement, multi-signer capability, and eIDAS support while remaining positioned as a focused signing solution rather than a full agreement lifecycle platform. In life sciences, teams increasingly expect predictive approval routing, API-driven automation, advanced field logic and audit-grade compliance records — capabilities that push many buyers to evaluate alternatives that combine enterprise integration, mobile-first signing, and scalable bulk or templating features to manage clinical, procurement, and vendor contracts.

Why teams look for GateKeeper alternatives

Organizations in life sciences often need stronger automation, broader identity verification, or clearer pricing when GateKeeper’s core signing features or deployment model do not meet complex regulatory workflows or high-volume contracting needs.

Key challenges with GateKeeper

• Limited API availability slows integrations with clinical systems and LIMS, complicating automated contract exchange across platforms.
• No native mobile apps for senders can hinder field teams and clinical staff who need to prepare and send documents remotely.
• Two-factor and advanced signer authentication are not available, increasing risk in workflows that require strict identity verification for compliance.
• Bulk sending and advanced conditional document visibility are missing, making large-scale investigator agreements or consent packet distribution inefficient.

How signNow compares to GateKeeper

signNow is positioned as an alternative that extends basic signing with additional automation, developer tools, and enterprise controls suitable for regulated environments.

• Stronger automation and conditional logic for complex form flows.
• Robust API and SDK support for embedding and system integrations.
• Better support for bulk sending and advanced recipient workflows.

Best-fit profiles

Small clinical teams

Life sciences groups with modest volume who need simple templates and HIPAA-aware signing can use signNow to centralize consent and vendor forms while keeping setup time low and support needs minimal.

Enterprise R&D organizations

Large research or manufacturing teams that require API-based automation, audit trails, and bulk distribution will favor platforms offering developer tools and advanced recipient authentication over GateKeeper’s more basic feature set.

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users!

Start free trial Request a demo

Security and compliance highlights

Audit trail: Tamper-evident records

HIPAA support: Available or assisted

Data residency: Cloud region options

SSO / SAML: Enterprise SSO available

PKI support: Optional for eID

QES / eIDAS: Qualified e-signature options

Is GateKeeper the right fit for specific life sciences workflows?

GateKeeper can be adequate for simple signing processes, but many regulated teams need alternatives that add automation, stronger authentication, or bulk capabilities.

Clinical consent distribution

Small clinics needing rapid consent collection with minimal setup

• reusable templates and simple signer flows
• reduces administrative time and errors

Resulting in faster enrollment and improved audit readiness

Vendor contracting at scale

Procurement teams sending many vendor templates at once

• require bulk send and conditional fields
• reduces manual routing and increases throughput

Leading to faster purchasing cycles and clearer compliance trails

Scaling signing workflows beyond GateKeeper

A short setup checklist helps teams migrate conditional logic, templates, and integrations from GateKeeper to a more automated platform.

• 01
  Map templates: Identify reusable forms and fields
• 02
  Enable API: Provision developer keys and access
• 03
  Configure authentication: Require 2FA or ID checks
• 04
  Test bulk send: Run pilot with sample recipients

Integration and data flow

Understanding how documents move between systems clarifies which vendor features matter most for life sciences integrations.

• Source systems: EHR, CRM, LIMS export documents
• Signing platform: Apply fields, routes, and authentication
• Post-sign: Automatic storage and audit export
• Downstream sync: Bi-directional updates to source systems

Signing experience and document management (GateKeeper focus)

GateKeeper delivers basic signing and document placement features, but lacks several advanced tools that speed contracting for regulated organizations.

Signing flow

Simple recipient flow that supports multiple signers and eIDAS signatures but does not provide embedded signing or in-app mobile sender experiences for document preparation.

Templates

Reusable templates exist for repeated forms and can pre-fill text, but GateKeeper does not support advanced conditional fields or calculated expressions for complex document logic.

Document storage

Basic cloud connectors are available for common drives, and executed documents include an audit trail; however, full-text search and document grouping are not provided.

Collaboration

Limited collaboration features; GateKeeper lacks redlining, shared document libraries, and team-based document workflows common in enterprise-focused alternatives.

eSignature that scales with your workflow

Start free trial Request a demo

Best practices when replacing GateKeeper

Follow a controlled migration that preserves compliance records and reduces downtime for clinical and procurement processes.

Preserve audit trails

Export existing execution reports and certificates from GateKeeper to retain legal evidence and maintain continuity in regulated recordkeeping before switching providers.

Validate identity methods

Match the new vendor’s authentication options to your SOPs and regulatory requirements, ensuring needed 2FA, KBA, or PKI are available and documented for auditors.

Pilot critical flows

Run pilots for investigator agreements, supplier contracts, and consent forms to verify field mapping, conditional logic, and bulk distributions prior to full cutover.

Train power users

Provide focused training and starter templates for research coordinators and procurement staff to minimize errors and reduce time-to-first-signature after migration.

Workflow automation, templates, and developer tools

Advanced workflows and API support are key differentiators for teams that outgrow GateKeeper’s core signing capabilities.

Bulk operations

GateKeeper does not support high-volume bulk sending; alternatives like signNow provide bulk send and mass-signature features to scale distribution and collection.

Advanced fields

GateKeeper lacks calculated and conditional field support, while some vendors offer conditional visibility and calculated fields for complex consent and pricing logic.

Embedded signing

GateKeeper does not offer embedded signing; third-party options provide embeddable signing widgets for integrated web or mobile experiences.

API & SDK

GateKeeper’s API capabilities are limited; vendors with full API and SDKs enable programmatic document generation, signing, and status callbacks.

Notifications

Automated reminders and adjustable notification settings are more extensive in alternatives, reducing signature latency across multi-party workflows.

Template management

Alternatives often include centralized libraries, field import, and template versioning to enforce consistency across regulatory documents.

Typical migration steps from GateKeeper

A concise roadmap helps teams switch with minimal disruption to regulatory processes and contract throughput.

01

Assess:

Inventory current templates

02

Map:

Map fields and roles

03

Integrate:

Set up API connections

04

Pilot:

Test with representative users

05

Migrate:

Move active envelopes

06

Train:

Onboard core teams

Legal validity and platform requirements

Ensure any replacement preserves enforceability under ESIGN, UETA, and eIDAS by retaining audit trails, signer intent records, and tamper-evident sealing.

• Audit evidence: Comprehensive logs
• Signature type: Electronic and qualified
• Document integrity: Tamper-evident seals

Verify that the new vendor provides exportable audit artifacts, chain-of-custody metadata, and configurable signer authentication so that court-admissible records remain available and regulatory obligations for clinical records or vendor contracts continue to be satisfied after migration.

Quick comparison: core feature availability

This table summarizes availability of frequently required features across GateKeeper, signNow, and other alternatives relevant to life sciences teams.

Criteria	signNow	GateKeeper	Notarize	FormStack	PandaDoc	Signaturit
eSign availability
API integration
Bulk send
HIPAA compliance

Over 150,000 organizations use signNow

Pricing structure overview

Pricing models vary: some vendors publish tiered plans while others require enterprise quotes for HIPAA or advanced features; below is a compact reference.

	signNow	GateKeeper	Notarize	FormStack	PandaDoc
Starter tier	$15 (Business plan)	Custom pricing	Pay-per-notary or pay-per-use	Contact sales	$19 (Basic plan)
Mid-tier	Tiered business features	Custom quotes	Volume pricing available	Mid-tier options vary	$49 (Business plan)
Enterprise	Custom enterprise pricing	Custom pricing	Enterprise agreements available	Enterprise quotes	Enterprise pricing available
Notes	Some features cost extra	Pricing upon request	Transactional fees possible	Feature bundles vary	Published starter and business tiers

Top GateKeeper Alternatives

signNow

★4.7/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Advanced fillable fields
• Bulk send support
• Embedded signing (extra cost)

Security & Compliance

• SOC2 compliance
• HIPAA assistance available
• Two-factor authentication

Cost & Plans

• $15 business plan
• Enterprise contracts available
• Optional add-on pricing

GateKeeper

★3.6/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Basic fillable fields
• Multiple signers
• eIDAS signatures

Security & Compliance

• Audit trail provided
• SSO/SAML support
• No HIPAA support

Cost & Plans

• Custom pricing
• Contact sales required
• Enterprise negotiation

Notarize

★4.3/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• In-person and remote notarization
• Mobile signing app
• Create invite links

Security & Compliance

• Audit trail
• Session recording options
• Limited HIPAA capabilities

Cost & Plans

• Per-notary fees
• Volume contracts available
• Enterprise pricing

FormStack

★4.0/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Basic fillable fields
• Google Drive connector
• Kiosk mode

Security & Compliance

• HIPAA compliance available
• SSO/SAML support
• Audit trail

Cost & Plans

• Tiered plans
• Contact sales for enterprise
• Add-ons available

PandaDoc

★4.5/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Document generation
• Merge documents
• Collect payments

Security & Compliance

• Audit trail provided
• Teams and roles
• Not HIPAA by default

Cost & Plans

• $19 Basic plan
• $49 Business plan
• Enterprise pricing available

Signaturit

★3.9/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• eIDAS and QES
• Salesforce connector
• Google Drive integration

Security & Compliance

• Qualified electronic signatures
• eIDAS alignment
• Limited HIPAA support

Cost & Plans

• Tiered plans
• Enterprise options
• Contact sales

FAQs: Choosing the right GateKeeper alternative

Common buyer questions focus on compliance, integration, signer authentication, pricing, and bulk distribution when deciding between GateKeeper and alternatives like signNow, PandaDoc, or Notarize.

• Does signNow support HIPAA compliance?
  Yes. signNow offers HIPAA-supporting features and can assist with compliance configurations for covered workflows; teams should request a business associate agreement and confirm required controls before storing sensitive health data.
• Can GateKeeper integrate with clinical systems?
  GateKeeper offers limited native connectors and SSO, but lacks a published API ecosystem; teams needing deep integration with EHRs or LIMS typically choose vendors with robust APIs such as signNow or PandaDoc.
• Which vendors provide bulk sending for study documents?
  signNow supports bulk send and mass distribution to lists of recipients; GateKeeper does not offer bulk send, while PandaDoc and some enterprise plans from other vendors offer varying bulk capabilities.
• Is notarization handled by these alternatives?
  Notarize specializes in remote and in-person notarization; other vendors like signNow focus on eSignature workflows but may integrate with notarization services when notarized signatures are required.
• How do authentication options compare?
  GateKeeper lacks advanced signer authentication; signNow and other alternatives provide two-factor, SMS, or knowledge-based checks and optional PKI or identity verification for high-assurance workflows.
• What should life sciences teams prioritize during selection?
  Prioritize audit exportability, authentication matched to regulatory requirements, API availability for systems integration, and bulk/template features for study and procurement scale; assess pricing impact for high-volume transactions.

Sureh Balasubramanian,

CEO at LiveHive

«I was closing another deal and had an outstanding quote already sent through DocuSign (I was trialing them) before we got connected. Sales VP was ready to sign the quote but was having trouble signing via DocuSign from his United WiFi — he was on a plane to Boston and would have been too late if I had to wait till he landed. I resent it to him via signNow and Voila! I had my signed contract in 30 mins! Great job signNow!»

Kodi-Marie Evans,

Director of NetSuite Operations at Xerox

«signNow provides us with the flexibility needed to get the right signatures on the right documents, in the right formats, based on our integration with NetSuite. This flexibility assists us with reducing our turnaround time on signatures so that we can get to the business of doing business. signNow is an amazing company with first-rate customer service.»

Jake Schroeder,

Vice President at The Benefits Store

«We found signNow to be better priced and exactly the solution we needed. signNow has significantly lowered our enrollment completion process by a day or two depending on the member.»

Dionte' Bryant,

Software Development Engineer

«The signature has become extremely simple to create. Customer care is additionally quite simple and also incorporating fields is super easy. We put it to use for all sorts of contracts. Custom contracts can be simple to operate, but we primarily work with them to send out the very same agreement template to almost all the clients of ours.»

Related links

DigiSigner competitors and alternatives for small businesses in staffing

Best electronic signature tools like DigiSigner for government

Best eSignature platforms similar to DigiSigner for terms and conditions

Best online signature platforms similar to DigiSigner for audit forms

Best PDF editing and DigiSigner alternatives for life sciences

Best contract negotiation and DigiSigner alternatives for sports organizations

be ready to get more

Get legally binding signatures now!

Start free trialRequest a demo