• Electronic Signature
• Resources
• Alternatives
• Best e-signature platforms similar to Fill for event registration forms

Best e-signature platforms similar to Fill for event registration forms

Start free trial

No credit card required

signNow regularly wins awards for ease of use and setup

Introduction to Fill

Fill is a streamlined e-signature and form solution aimed at quick document completion and in-person collection, often used for event registration forms where speed and simplicity matter. It provides basic template libraries, signing order customization, and an audit trail for signed records. Fill focuses on a minimal setup and straightforward sender flow rather than complex automation or extensive developer toolkits. Organizations using Fill typically prioritize low-friction signer experiences and easy template reuse over deep integrations or enterprise-grade compliance configurations.

Why teams look for Fill alternatives

Teams migrate away from Fill when they need stronger automation, mass sending, advanced identity checks, or tighter integrations with CRMs and payment systems that Fill doesn't fully provide.

Key challenges with Fill

• Limited bulk-invite and bulk-send capabilities increase manual work for high-volume event registration workflows.
• Minimal mobile and offline app support complicates on-site attendee signing for multi-day events or poor-network venues.
• Advanced field logic and conditional fields are not available, reducing dynamic form behavior for complex registration needs.
• No built-in HIPAA attestation or advanced compliance options, limiting use for regulated event data collection scenarios.

How signNow compares to Fill

signNow offers a broader feature set aimed at teams that need enterprise controls, bulk operations, and stronger integration options compared to Fill.

• Greater automation: bulk send, conditional documents, and calculated fields reduce manual prep and improve throughput.
• Stronger compliance: HIPAA support, SOC2, and advanced authentication choices meet regulated use cases.
• Richer integrations: native cloud storage, CRM connectors, and developer APIs enable seamless data flow.

Security and compliance in Fill

Audit Trail: Signature history and audit trail available

eSignature Laws: Works with ESIGN/UETA enforceability

HIPAA: No built-in HIPAA attestation

API Access: Integration API supported

In-person capture: Supports in-person signing

Templates: Reusable templates included

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users!

Start free trial Request a demo

Fill signing experience and developer tools

Fill centers on quick document preparation and immediate signing flows; it's optimized for simple event registration forms and on-site capture rather than complex integrations or conditional logic.

Signer flow

Fill delivers a straightforward signer experience with no-account-required signing for attendees, streamlined field placement, and in-person capture to speed registration lines at events, though it lacks advanced signer drafting or multi-stage approval orchestration that larger teams may require.

Field tooling

Basic ready-to-use fillable forms and templates let organizers reuse registration documents, but Fill does not include advanced calculated fields, conditional visibility, or complex field validation that would support tiered registration or conditional waivers.

Developer access

Fill provides an integration API for automating document creation and submission, useful for connecting to simple registration systems, yet it lacks the breadth of SDKs and embedded signing customization found in more developer-focused platforms.

Preparation speed

Preparing and sending a registration form in Fill is fast due to template reuse and signing order customization, but larger event teams may need bulk-send or invite-link options to scale signings efficiently.

Document management and what sets Fill apart

Fill provides baseline document lifecycle features suitable for single-event or small-scale registration management where simplicity and quick setup are priorities.

Library

Document library and templates centralize registration forms and speed reuse across events without complex generation rules.

Expiration

Document expiration settings help enforce deadlines for registration sign-offs and limit stale invites for event attendees.

Signing order

Signing order customization enables sequential approvals when more than one organizer or stakeholder must sign registration confirmations.

Auditability

A signature history and audit trail ensure each registration record includes timestamped evidence of signer intent.

Limitations

Missing bulk invite, conditional fields, and mobile offline modes restrict Fill's effectiveness for large, distributed event deployments.

Use focus

Optimized for low-friction, in-person, and small-volume registration rather than enterprise automation.

Integration with Fill and business tools

Fill supports basic API integration and template imports, enabling simple data exchanges with registration systems and manual cloud exports where available.

• API: Integration API available
• Cloud export: Automatic export not enabled
• CRM sync: Limited native CRM connectors
• Templates import: Fields import and template reuse

Legal validity of Fill eSignatures

Fill-generated signatures include an audit trail and signer metadata that support enforceability under the ESIGN Act and UETA when used in U.S. jurisdictions.

• ESIGN/UETA: Supports legal enforceability
• Audit record: Court-admissible audit trail
• eIDAS: No qualified eIDAS support

For cross-border or regulated use cases requiring eIDAS QES or formal attestation, teams should evaluate alternatives that list explicit eIDAS or advanced identity verification features.

Workflow automation and bulk sending with Fill

Scaling registrations in Fill requires a mix of built-in features and workarounds when bulk or conditional sending is needed.

01

Prepare templates:

Create reusable registration templates to reduce repeated setup work.

02

Use signing order:

Define recipient order for sequential approvals and confirmations.

03

API batching:

Automate multiple requests through the integration API for pseudo-bulk sends.

04

Manual invites:

Fallback to manual invites when bulk send isn't available.

05

Expiry rules:

Apply document expiration to manage registration windows.

06

Export results:

Export signed records for event attendance reconciliation.

eSignature that scales with your workflow

Start free trial Request a demo

Quick comparison table

This side-by-side compares essential capabilities relevant to event registration forms across signNow, Fill, and selected competitors.

Criteria	signNow	Fill	Oneflow	Concord	FormStack	Signable
API Integration
In-person signing
Bulk send
Templates

Top Fill alternatives

signNow

★4.7/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Advanced conditional fields
• Bulk send
• Embedded signing

Security & Compliance

• SOC/SOC2
• HIPAA support (extra cost)
• SSO/SAML

Cost Structure

• Business plan $15
• Enterprise plan $30 per month
• Transparent pricing

Fill

★4.2/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Templates
• In-person signing
• Signing order customization

Security & Compliance

• Audit trail
• No HIPAA support
• Integration API

Cost Structure

• No public pricing
• Small-team focus
• Pay-as-you-scale unknown

Oneflow

★4.3/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Magic fields detection
• Bulk invite
• Templates

Security & Compliance

• Audit trail
• No HIPAA support
• API integration

Cost Structure

• Basic plan 38
• Business plan not listed
• Per-feature pricing

Concord

★4.1/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Reusable templates
• Multiple signers
• Salesforce integration

Security & Compliance

• Audit trail
• SSO/SAML
• No HIPAA support

Cost Structure

• Public pricing unknown
• Team plans available
• Negotiated enterprise offers

FormStack

★4.0/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Mobile apps
• Templates
• Set signing order

Security & Compliance

• Audit trail
• HIPAA compliance
• SSO/SAML

Cost Structure

• Custom pricing
• Plan tiers vary
• Enterprise options

Signable

★4.3/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• In-person signing
• Merge documents
• Create signing links

Security & Compliance

• Audit trail
• Advanced threat protection
• Unique document ID

Cost Structure

• Monthly plans available
• Pay-as-you-go options
• Small-team pricing

Is Fill right for your event registration needs?

Fill is best for simple, quick on-site registration flows where minimal setup and fast signer throughput are priorities.

Event Registration

Organizers need fast, in-person sign capture with minimal friction

• Fill offers ready-to-use fillable forms and in-person signing to speed attendee check-in
• This reduces queue times and simplifies volunteers' tasks during events

Resulting in faster attendee processing and fewer lost registrations.

High-volume Signings

Large events require bulk distribution, automated reminders, and conditional logic to handle varied ticket types

• Fill lacks built-in bulk send and conditional fields which complicates scaling for thousands of registrants
• Teams often need API-based batching or a platform with native bulk features and automation for reliable throughput

Leading to smoother large-scale registration and automated post-registration workflows.

FAQs: Choosing the right Fill alternative

Common buyer questions about Fill and alternatives, focusing on scaling, compliance, integration, and signer experience.

• Can Fill handle thousands of event registrants?
  Fill lacks native bulk-send functionality, so large-scale registrant lists usually require API automation or a platform with built-in bulk invite features like signNow or Oneflow to avoid manual sending.
• Which alternatives support HIPAA for sensitive attendee data?
  signNow and FormStack list HIPAA support or assistance options; Fill does not provide HIPAA attestation, so regulated events should use platforms with explicit compliance statements.
• Is embedded signing available for branded registration pages?
  signNow supports embedded signing (with some features available for extra cost), while Fill focuses on straightforward sending and in-person capture without deep embedded page customization.
• How do I verify attendee identity for high-security events?
  Choose vendors offering advanced recipient authentication and two-factor methods; signNow provides multiple verification options, whereas Fill has basic authentication and no advanced KBA options.
• Which platforms offer the best mobile on-site signing experience?
  signNow, FormStack, and Signable provide mobile apps or kiosk modes; Fill supports in-person signing but lacks full mobile/offline app support for complex, multi-day event scenarios.
• What are practical migration steps from Fill to another provider?
  Export templates and signed records, map fields to the new vendor's template engine, and run pilot events to validate signer flows before full cutover to minimize disruptions.

Support and customer experience considerations

Assess vendor support, onboarding resources, and self-help materials when selecting an alternative to Fill for event workflows.

Onboarding resources available

Choose a vendor with starter tutorials, demo templates, and clear API documentation to reduce setup time and help event staff adopt new workflows quickly.

Support channels and SLAs

Prefer providers that list live chat, email support, or paid SLA tiers for mission-critical events to ensure timely assistance during registration windows.

Knowledge base depth

A well-maintained knowledge base with step-by-step guides on bulk sending, template creation, and mobile kiosk setup reduces reliance on vendor support for routine tasks.

Pilot and training

Run a pilot registration and train staff on new signing flows, device setup, and outage contingencies to avoid last-minute issues on event day.

Over 150,000 organizations use signNow

Best-fit alternatives by workflow

Small event teams

Small teams running local events benefit from Fill's simple templates and in-person signing, but signNow or Signable may be better when occasional bulk invites or integrations become necessary; choose based on whether you need HIPAA or CRM sync.

Enterprise organizers

Large or regulated events should prefer signNow or FormStack for advanced automation, HIPAA options, bulk sending, and deeper CRM integrations to handle high volumes and compliance requirements reliably.

Sureh Balasubramanian,

CEO at LiveHive

«I was closing another deal and had an outstanding quote already sent through DocuSign (I was trialing them) before we got connected. Sales VP was ready to sign the quote but was having trouble signing via DocuSign from his United WiFi — he was on a plane to Boston and would have been too late if I had to wait till he landed. I resent it to him via signNow and Voila! I had my signed contract in 30 mins! Great job signNow!»

Kodi-Marie Evans,

Director of NetSuite Operations at Xerox

«signNow provides us with the flexibility needed to get the right signatures on the right documents, in the right formats, based on our integration with NetSuite. This flexibility assists us with reducing our turnaround time on signatures so that we can get to the business of doing business. signNow is an amazing company with first-rate customer service.»

Jake Schroeder,

Vice President at The Benefits Store

«We found signNow to be better priced and exactly the solution we needed. signNow has significantly lowered our enrollment completion process by a day or two depending on the member.»

Dionte' Bryant,

Software Development Engineer

«The signature has become extremely simple to create. Customer care is additionally quite simple and also incorporating fields is super easy. We put it to use for all sorts of contracts. Custom contracts can be simple to operate, but we primarily work with them to send out the very same agreement template to almost all the clients of ours.»

Related links

Penneo alternatives for small businesses in construction industry

Best Penneo alternatives for sales inquiries

Penneo alternatives for corporations and event and vendor approvals

Best document editing and Penneo alternatives for insurance industry

Top Penneo competitors for teams in construction industry

Best eSignature tools like Penneo for sports organizations

be ready to get more

Get legally binding signatures now!

Start free trialRequest a demo