Templates
Reusable templates and a document library exist, enabling repeatable consent and approval forms for routine study tasks and SOPs.
Organizations search for alternatives when they need stronger compliance, more advanced automation, or native integrations that scale across clinical trials and regulated workflows.
signNow is positioned for teams that need enterprise-grade controls, broader integrations, and advanced field logic compared to Sign on the go.
For life sciences teams requiring scale, signNow often reduces manual steps and integrates more readily into electronic data capture and record systems.
Clinical teams needing rapid, mobile consent capture and cloud export will value Sign on the go for its kiosk mode and mobile apps, but may require additional automation and compliance features from alternatives for audit-heavy studies.
Operations managers looking to streamline vendor onboarding and equipment sign-offs benefit from Sign on the go’s simple signing flows, yet may prefer a platform with built-in team management and advanced templates for high-volume processes.
Native iOS and Android apps with in-person signing and tablet kiosk mode; straightforward recipient flow for field teams and on-site consent capture.
Editor supports up to 12 fields and basic templates, but lacks advanced field validation and conditional logic for complex scientific forms and calculated values.
API integration is available for embedding signing flows and automating exports to supported cloud storage providers used in research workflows.
Custom branding requires API usage rather than being available in the product UI, increasing development work for white-label deployments.
Reusable templates and a document library exist, enabling repeatable consent and approval forms for routine study tasks and SOPs.
Automatic export to Box, Dropbox, OneDrive, and Google Drive streamlines storage and archival within existing life sciences repositories.
Signing order customization and expiration settings help sequence multi-party approvals and enforce deadlines for review cycles.
Bulk invite capability supports sending many signature requests but lacks some advanced merging and mass-field population found in enterprise tools.
Kiosk mode on tablets and in-person signing support field operations and site-based consent collection.
Editor supports a fixed number of fields (12), which can constrain complex documents without pre-merging content.
| signNow | Sign on the go | Adobe Sign | EverSign | Zoho Sign | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $15/mo | $12/mo | $15/mo | $9.99/mo | $10/mo |
| Business price | $30+/mo (Enterprise) | $40/mo | $15/mo | $39.99/mo | Contact sales |
| Payment collection | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Notes | Transparent tiers; enterprise add-ons | Custom branding via API | Enterprise plans available | Free trial then paid tiers | Competitive entry-level pricing |
Electronic signatures must meet statutory standards and produce an audit trail; platforms differ in their out-of-the-box support and add-on compliance services.
For regulated life sciences use, confirm whether the provider offers HIPAA support, CFR Part 11 controls, and explicit enterprise SLAs before adoption; Sign on the go provides audit trail and export but lacks built-in HIPAA compliance.
| Criteria | signNow | Sign on the go | Adobe Sign | Signority | Notarize | Zoho Sign |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eSign available | ||||||
| Mobile apps | ios, android | ios, android | ios, android | |||
| API integration | ||||||
| HIPAA support | yes (add-on) |
Field teams need quick on-site consent capture with simple templates
Leading to faster subject onboarding while smaller teams may accept limited automation.
Operational teams require repeatable onboarding checklists and audit trails
Resulting in reduced manual follow-up and clearer vendor records for audits.