• Electronic Signature
• Resources
• Alternatives
• Concord alternatives for teams in life sciences

Concord alternatives for teams in life sciences

Start free trial

No credit card required

signNow regularly wins awards for ease of use and setup

Introduction to Concord

Concord is a contract lifecycle and eSignature tool used by teams to centralize document approval and execution. For life sciences teams, Concord offers basic field placement, multi-signer flows, templates, and Salesforce connectivity, positioning it as a practical contract center rather than a full agreement automation platform. As organizations scale, buyers increasingly evaluate Concord against platforms that add stronger automation, clinical- and research-grade compliance options, richer APIs, and enterprise controls that reduce manual routing and speed trial and procurement processes.

Why teams search for Concord alternatives

Life sciences teams often need stricter compliance, advanced field logic, and bulk automation that can exceed Concord’s baseline feature set, prompting a search for specialized alternatives.

Key challenges with Concord

• Limited advanced field logic can force manual calculations or external preprocessing of clinical data collection forms.
• No HIPAA attestation restricts direct use for protected health information without supplementary controls.
• Mobile signing and native apps are absent, increasing friction for remote investigators and field reps.
• Conditional routing and document visibility are not supported, complicating multi-arm study approvals.

How signNow compares to Concord

signNow targets teams that need a tighter mix of automation, compliance, and developer tooling compared to Concord.

• Advanced fields and calculations available for complex clinical forms.
• Built-in HIPAA support and two-factor options for regulated workflows.
• Robust API and integrations for EMR and CRM connectivity.

For life sciences teams requiring audit-ready records and scalable bulk operations, signNow commonly reduces manual handoffs and improves execution speed versus Concord.

Best-fit user profiles

Clinical Operations

Clinical operations teams benefit from platforms that combine advanced field logic with audit trails and two-factor signer authentication to protect PHI and maintain protocol compliance across multi-site studies.

Procurement & Legal

Procurement and legal need bulk-send, reusable templates, and API-driven document generation to process vendor agreements at scale while preserving signing order and traceability.

Join over 28 million airSlate SignNow users!

Start free trial Request a demo

Security and compliance at a glance

Encryption: At-rest and in-transit

Audit trail: Tamper-evident record

SSO/SAML: Enterprise single sign-on

HIPAA: Attestation available

SOC/SOC2: Service audit reports

Two-factor: Signer 2FA options

Is Concord the right choice for these life sciences workflows?

Concord can fit simple contracting use cases but often lacks controls needed for regulated study workflows.

Site agreements

Many teams use Concord for initial site agreements

• template reuse reduces prep time
• but limited conditional fields require manual edits

Leading to extra review cycles and slower site activation.

Vendor contracting

Concord handles single-instance vendor agreements well

• straightforward signature capture reduces send time
• however, absence of HIPAA certification complicates PHI exchanges

Resulting in additional compliance steps outside the platform.

Workflow: scaling signatures beyond Concord

A typical upgrade path focuses on authentication, templating, and bulk automation to reduce manual work.

• 01
  Step 1: Enable reusable templates
• 02
  Step 2: Add signer authentication
• 03
  Step 3: Set signing order
• 04
  Step 4: Use bulk send

Integration patterns for life sciences teams

Integrations typically connect eSignature to CRM, contract repository, and clinical systems to create a single source of truth.

• CRM sync: Push signed documents to Salesforce
• Cloud storage: Automatic export to cloud drives
• API hooks: Embed signing in portals
• Webhooks: Real-time status updates

Signing experience and document handling

Compare how platforms handle signer convenience, template automation, and document grouping: life sciences teams benefit from low-friction recipient flows and powerful template engines to avoid repetitive manual edits.

Recipient flow

No-account signing decreases abandonment; advanced platforms offer account-free signing plus clear signer guidance and multi-language support for global sites.

Template engine

Reusable templates with role-based fields and automatic field population speed execution and reduce errors in repeated protocol documents and NDA templates.

Document groups

Grouping executed documents and versioning keeps regulatory documents together for audits and inspection readiness.

Field types

Advanced field types such as conditional and calculated fields capture structured clinical data and reduce spreadsheet reconciliation.

eSignature that scales with your workflow

Start free trial Request a demo

Best practices when replacing Concord

When evaluating alternatives, prioritize compliance features, automation, and developer tooling to minimize manual overhead in regulated environments.

Map regulatory requirements early

Document data residency, PHI handling, and audit needs before choosing a vendor to ensure the platform meets clinical trial and institutional requirements.

Prioritize API and webhook support

APIs enable programmatic document generation and status tracking, which are essential for integrating with trial management systems and eTMF platforms.

Test signer experience on mobile

Field personnel and site staff often rely on mobile devices; test signing flows on phones and tablets to prevent abandoned signatures.

Standardize templates

Create version-controlled templates to reduce manual edits and ensure consistent clauses across study sites and vendor agreements.

Template libraries, automation and developer tools

Look for platforms that combine deep templating, conditional logic, and mature APIs to automate repetitive workflows across sites and vendors.

Reusable templates

Large libraries and role-based fields let you onboard new agreements quickly while keeping signer responsibilities clear.

Conditional logic

Show or hide sections based on responses to capture protocol-specific variations without multiple templates.

Bulk sending

Send a single template to hundreds of recipients with individualized fields for enrollment or consent processes.

API access

Robust REST APIs and SDKs enable embedding and automating document generation in clinical portals.

Field automation

Smart fields and automatic data population reduce manual entry and reconciliation across systems.

Embedded signing

In-app signing reduces context switching and keeps users within clinical or vendor portals.

Deploying a replacement for Concord

A phased deployment reduces risk: start with templates, then automate routing, and finally integrate via API.

01

Phase 1:

Migrate templates

02

Phase 2:

Enable authentication

03

Phase 3:

Automate routing

04

Phase 4:

Integrate via API

05

Phase 5:

Monitor and iterate

06

Phase 6:

Train stakeholders

Platform requirements for life sciences

Define mandatory platform requirements for PHI handling, auditability, and automatable workflows before shortlisting alternatives to Concord.

• Authentication: Multi-factor sign-in
• Audit trail: Court-admissible logs
• APIs: Comprehensive endpoints

Ensure the chosen vendor provides documented HIPAA controls, verifiable audit logs, and APIs for EMR or LIMS integrations so the platform supports inspections, secure PHI exchanges, and automated lifecycle management.

Recommended workflow settings

Use these workflow defaults when configuring a replacement eSignature platform for regulated document flows.

Feature	Configuration
Reminder Frequency	48 hours
Signing Order	Sequential
Authentication Method	Two-factor
Field Validation	Required

Over 150,000 organizations use signNow

Quick comparison: feature availability

This table compares core capabilities across signNow, Concord, and five common alternatives to help life sciences teams spot critical gaps quickly.

Criteria	signNow	Concord	DocuSign	HelloSign	RightSignature	Notarize
HIPAA compliant			available-light icon	for extra cost
API integration
Bulk send
Mobile apps					ios, android

Pricing snapshot

Pricing varies by plan and required compliance features; below are representative plan prices and notes derived from vendor disclosures and plan descriptions.

	signNow	Concord	DocuSign	HelloSign	RightSignature
Business plan	$15/user/mo	Contact sales	$40/user/mo (Business Pro)	$25/user/mo (Business)	$99/month (Business)
Enterprise note	$30/mo Enterprise option	Contact sales	Custom quote	Contact sales	Contact sales
Payments support	Yes	No	Business Pro ($40)	No	Yes
Bulk send availability	Yes	Yes	Business Pro ($40)	Yes	Yes

Top Concord alternatives for teams in life sciences

signNow

★4.6/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Advanced conditional fields
• Bulk send and templates
• API and embedded signing

Security & Compliance

• HIPAA support available
• SOC2 and SSO
• Tamper-evident audit trail

Cost Structure

• $15/user business plan
• $30 per month enterprise note
• Payments supported

Concord

★4.2/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Basic fillable fields
• Templates and Salesforce
• Bulk send support

Security & Compliance

• Audit trail included
• SSO available
• No HIPAA attestation

Cost Structure

• Contact sales for plans
• Standard team tiers
• No built-in payments

RightSignature

★4.1/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Fillable fields support
• Bulk sending and templates
• Mobile apps (iOS/Android)

Security & Compliance

• Signature audit trail
• Document sharing controls
• No HIPAA attestation

Cost Structure

• $60 basic plan
• $99 business plan
• Payments receiving supported

Notarize

★4.0/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Remote notarization focus
• Reusable templates
• Mobile apps for signers

Security & Compliance

• Audit trail included
• Two-factor signer auth
• Limited enterprise controls

Cost Structure

• Usage-based notarization fees
• Contact sales for volume
• No payments or templates limits

DocuSign

★4.7/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Enterprise-grade features
• Extensive integrations
• Bulk send and advanced routing

Security & Compliance

• HIPAA and CFR options
• Advanced recipient authentication
• Comprehensive audit logs

Cost Structure

• $40/user Business Pro
• Custom enterprise quotes
• Extra cost for some integrations

HelloSign

★4.4/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Clear signing UI
• Reusable templates
• Out-of-the-box integrations

Security & Compliance

• Hosted on AWS/Azure
• Conditional fields support
• HIPAA help for extra cost

Cost Structure

• $15 basic plan
• $25 business plan
• Embedded signing extra cost

SignEasy

★4.3/5 (G2)

Capabilities

• Mobile-first signing
• Offline mode on mobile
• Reusable templates

Security & Compliance

• Audit trail available
• SSO support for teams
• No HIPAA attestation

Cost Structure

• Small-team pricing
• Integrations with key apps
• Contact sales for enterprise

FAQs: Choosing the right Concord alternative

Find concise answers to common questions life sciences teams ask when comparing Concord to signNow and other alternatives.

• How does signNow differ from Concord for PHI workloads?
  signNow includes documented HIPAA controls and optional assistance for compliance, while Concord does not provide a HIPAA attestation, requiring teams to add compensating controls for PHI.
• Can Concord handle bulk sending for investigator packets?
  Concord supports bulk sending for repeated documents, but it lacks advanced conditional fields and calculated logic that can simplify personalized investigator packets compared with higher-tier alternatives.
• Which vendors offer strong developer APIs for LIMS or EMR integration?
  signNow, DocuSign, HelloSign, RightSignature, and Notarize provide APIs or integration options; signNow and DocuSign are commonly used for deeper programmatic embeddings.
• Is two-factor signer authentication available across these platforms?
  Two-factor or SMS authentication is available in signNow and Notarize; other vendors offer advanced recipient authentication depending on plan level or add-ons.
• Which solution is best for remote notarization needs?
  Notarize specializes in remote notarization and offers a tailored workflow and mobile signing for notarized documents; other platforms do not provide notarization as a core capability.
• What should procurement evaluate besides price?
  Evaluate audit logs, data residency, API maturity, template automation, and HIPAA or SOC2 compliance, since these factors impact regulatory readiness and total operational cost.

Sureh Balasubramanian,

CEO at LiveHive

«I was closing another deal and had an outstanding quote already sent through DocuSign (I was trialing them) before we got connected. Sales VP was ready to sign the quote but was having trouble signing via DocuSign from his United WiFi — he was on a plane to Boston and would have been too late if I had to wait till he landed. I resent it to him via signNow and Voila! I had my signed contract in 30 mins! Great job signNow!»

Kodi-Marie Evans,

Director of NetSuite Operations at Xerox

«signNow provides us with the flexibility needed to get the right signatures on the right documents, in the right formats, based on our integration with NetSuite. This flexibility assists us with reducing our turnaround time on signatures so that we can get to the business of doing business. signNow is an amazing company with first-rate customer service.»

Jake Schroeder,

Vice President at The Benefits Store

«We found signNow to be better priced and exactly the solution we needed. signNow has significantly lowered our enrollment completion process by a day or two depending on the member.»

Dionte' Bryant,

Software Development Engineer

«The signature has become extremely simple to create. Customer care is additionally quite simple and also incorporating fields is super easy. We put it to use for all sorts of contracts. Custom contracts can be simple to operate, but we primarily work with them to send out the very same agreement template to almost all the clients of ours.»

Related links

Best online signature platforms similar to Ascertia for information security policy documents

Ascertia alternatives for organizations and NDAs

Ascertia alternatives for enterprises and onboarding forms

Top Ascertia competitors for businesses in real estate

Best contract negotiation and Ascertia alternatives for life sciences

Ascertia alternatives for businesses and information services forms

be ready to get more

Get legally binding signatures now!

Start free trialRequest a demo